New York electricity customers could pay up to $33 billion over 20 years to keep four aging nuclear power plants operational ...

Trump Administration opposition to renewable energy could clear a path for nuclear power use in NY over the next 15 years, state energy experts say.

By Joseph Hally, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Central Hudson customers—and millions of New Yorkers like them—depend on a reliable, affordable, and clean ...

The point is to make nuclear energy appear cool while rendering high-level concepts digestible for a mainstream, very online ...

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul’s intent to build a nuclear power plant — the first in the U.S. in more than 15 years — has sparked near-instantaneous interest and acute concern among state ...

Gov. Kathy Hochul just announced plans for a major new nuclear power plant, and the buzz is already building. If you're curious about what this means for New York's energy future, you're not alone.

That’s why I recently directed the New York Power Authority to take the next step in building an advanced nuclear power plant upstate. It’s a bold move, but one grounded in reality.

Hochul’s U-turn on nuclear power confirms that for the last 15 years New York has had no real plan for power production — just a scattershot array of fads, press releases and photo ops.

The estimated cost was $14 billion; the actual cost was $35 billion. All nuclear plants are long-term plans. If New York wants more power plants, the fastest construction is gas-powered plants.

About 15% of New York nuclear power, about 3.3 GW, is from three upstate plants: Ginna, Nine Mile Point and FitzPatrick that are located along Lake Ontario and now are owned and operated by ...