Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. NRDC, 467 U.S. 837 (1984) - Justia US …
WEBChevron U.S.A., Inc. v. NRDC: A government agency must conform to any clear legislative statements when interpreting and applying a law, but courts will give the agency deference in ambiguous situations as long as its interpretation is reasonable.
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
WEBChevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that set forth the legal test used when U.S. federal courts must defer to a government agency's interpretation of a …
Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
WEBSeveral environmental groups, including the Natural Resources Defense Council, challenged the bubble provision as contrary to the Act. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit set aside the EPA regulation as inappropriate for a …
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc ...
WEBSummary. When there was a challenge to the Environmental Protection Agency’s interpretation of the word “source” in a law regulating air pollution, the Supreme Court considered whether silence (or ambiguity) in a statute means that a reviewing court can freely impose its own interpretation.
CHEVRON, U.S.A., INC., Petitioner, v. NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL ...
WEBPetitioners, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., American Iron and Steel Institute, American Petroleum Institute, Chemical Manufacturers Association, Inc., General Motors Corp., and Rubber Manufacturers Association were granted leave to intervene and …
Chevron USA Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
WEBBrief Fact Summary. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 (Amendments) made requirements applicable to states that had not achieved the national air quality standards established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in earlier legislation.
WEBCHEVRON U. S. A. INC. v. NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 82-1005. Argued February 29, 1984-Decided June 25, 1984*
WEBCERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT . No. 22–451. Argued January 17, 2024—Decided June 28, 2024* The Court granted certiorari in these cases limited to the question whether . Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U. S. …
Supreme Court strikes down Chevron, curtailing power of federal ...
WEBJun 28, 2024 · By a vote of 6-3, the justices overruled their landmark 1984 decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, which gave rise to the doctrine known as the Chevron doctrine. Under that doctrine, if Congress has not directly addressed the question at the center of a dispute, a court was required to uphold the agency’s interpretation of ...
Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
WEBOct 4, 2022 · Several environmental groups, including the Natural Resources Defense Council, challenged the bubble provision as contrary to the Act. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit set aside the EPA regulation as inappropriate for a program enacted to improve air quality.